No Forced Vaccines aims to maintain the fundamental human right for adults to freely choose their health care interventions and for parents to make the health care choices they deem appropriate for their child/ren.
This includes the right of parents to make decisions about whether or not they want their children to be vaccinated – and if parents do want their children to be vaccinated parents have the right to choose which vaccine(s) their child has and at what age.
In NZ, children are legally able to make their own decisions about their health care at the age of 16; below the age of sixteen, their parents are responsible for their children’s health care.
No Forced Vaccines was formed in response to the Report of the Health [Select] Committee Inquiry into How to Improve Completion Rates of Childhood Immunisation. The full report may be downloaded from the NZ parliament website at the following link:
The recommendations in the Report of the Health Select Committee include a number of coercive recommendations. Those that are of most concern to parents are detailed below:
Unfortunately it appears that the government is still seriously considering some of these recommendations.
Recommendations concerning early childhood education and school enrolments
Among the many recommendations made in the Report is the following: We recommend to the Government that it strengthen the requirements on parents to present immunisation information when their children enrol at early childhood centres or schools. The required immunisation information should consist of either a certificate demonstrating that the child has received all the appropriate vaccinations, or a written statement that the parents have declined to immunise their child. We consider this should be implemented within one year.” [Page 20]
This recommendation appears to be based on the “Six star plan” presented to the Health Select Committee by Dr Nikki Turner who works for the Immunisation Advisory Centre (IMAC). (Until 2010, IMAC acknowledged funding from the NZ Ministry of Health and five pharmaceutical companies supplying vaccines to the NZ market. The relevant page was removed from the site after it was publicised. The site now has a Funding page that now acknowledges the Ministry of Health as IMAC’s major funder and that the organisation also receives financial support from “private industry”.)
Parts of Dr Turner’s “Six star plan” appear to be modeled on the system currently used in Australia, which is described on Page 17 of the Report of the Health [Select] Committee. An excerpt from Dr Turner’s “Six star plan” which is appended to the Report of the Health [Select] Committee is as follows:
“When a parent enrols a child, they either present a certificate demonstrating a fully completed immunisation series appropriate to the age, or a completed declination form. Either needs to be delivered and recorded by the ECEC [Early Childhood Education Centre]. If a child is enrolled when they are under two years of age, on their second birthday the ECEC will be obliged to contact the parents and view, and record that they have viewed, the completed certificate or declination form.
Possible restriction of access to 20 Hours Free Early Childhood Education
“The current free entitlement to 20 hours early childhood education will continue to be offered to all parents and caregivers; however eligibility will include the obligation from the ECEC to obtain from the parents a certificate of completion of immunisation events or a current declination form.”
The wording of the Recommendation 18 in the Report of the Health [Select] Committee that “The required immunisation information should consist of either a certificate demonstrating that the child has received all the appropriate vaccinations, or a written statement that the parents have declined to immunise their child” [emphasis added] also suggests that if this recommendation is accepted by the government, parents will be coerced into making an all or nothing choice when it comes to vaccination.
Currently, while early childhood services and schools have to request that parents show their child’s Immunisation Certificate, (if the child has one) at the time of enrollment, parents are able to choose whether they would like their child/ren to have all, some or none of the vaccinations recommended by the Ministry of Health, as they think appropriate for their child/ren – and they can also choose the age at which their child/ren receive any vaccine(s). (Many parents prefer to delay their baby’s initial vaccination appointment until s/he is older than the age of six weeks recommended by the Ministry of Health.)
Any policy which requires parents to either present a certificate which states that their child/ren has had “all the appropriate vaccinations” (or “a written statement that the parents have declined to immunise their child” ) erodes current parental rights to make the decisions about their child/ren’s health care and unlawfully restricts a child’s access to education at both preschool and school level.
We find the proposal that children and young people be excluded from educational opportunities on the basis of their vaccination status to be unacceptable.
Possible Linking of Children’s Vaccinations to Existing Parental Benefits
We are also concerned that the report suggests “examining the possibility of linking existing parental benefits to immunisation.”
At a time when many families are facing unprecedented financial stress due to the economic downturn and the Canterbury earthquake, any proposal that might financially penalise families who do not follow the vaccination schedule recommended by the Ministry of Health is morally unacceptable.
The information on this page summarises the concerns of No Forced Vaccines about the Report of the Health Select Committee following its Inquiry into “how to increase immunisation completion rates” may affect parents in NZ. For the most recent developments in NZ government vaccination policy, please see the Breaking News page at this link http://www.noforcedvaccines.org/breaking-news/